Candidate Q&A
Why are you running?
I am running for office to fight for a future where every individual has the opportunity to thrive without government overreach and unnecessary interference. I believe in fiscal responsibility, individual liberty, and the empowerment of local communities. The current political climate, dominated by progressive ideals, has undermined the principles that made our country strong: personal responsibility, economic freedom, and limited government. I want to ensure that we restore sanity to our economic policies, defend our individual rights, and create an environment where families can prosper. Running for office is my commitment to fight for those values.
My opponent has held office since the 20th century and is now 80 years old. Her grip on power has been maintained through gerrymandering, alignment with powerful figures in Congress, and the advantage of incumbency. Her actions, statements, and policy choices often fail to reflect the will of her constituents or serve their best interests. She supports unfettered immigration, is proud of Chicago's sanctuary city status, endorses inflationary government spending, and consistently prioritizes political ideology and power over the needs of the American people. As your next Congressman, I promise to genuinely represent your interests, putting your will ahead of partisan politics.
How has your district been impacted by the migrant crisis and what do you think should be done?
The 9th U.S. Congressional District of Illinois has been deeply affected by illegal immigration. At one end of the spectrum, constituents are constantly asked for money at stoplights, grocery store entrances, and other public spaces. Our children witness families begging on the roadside with cardboard signs, while their kids suffer in the heat as their parents walk up and down streets or shopping plazas. Tent cities have sprung up in public parks, under bridges, along roadsides, and even at police stations.
At the other end, Chicago faces a $1 billion budget deficit, driven in part by the hundreds of millions spent housing migrants. Crime is rising, and people are afraid. The district is bearing the consequences of Chicago’s poor policies and sanctuary city status.
Americans are not opposed to immigration—they simply want it done legally. They want to stop being solicited for money at every turn and for their public resources to be prioritized for tax-paying citizens.
The solution to this issue is simple and straightforward. The government must close the border to illegal migration, send those who are here illegally back to their home country or have them wait in Mexico for proper processing, and Chicago must formally end its sanctuary city status. The needs of American taxpayers must be prioritized in all decisions, above political ideology or the needs of those entering the country unlawfully. By enforcing these measures, we can restore order, protect our communities, and ensure that public resources serve the people who contribute to and sustain this nation.
What do you think immigration reform in Congress should look like?
Immigration reform in Congress should start with securing the U.S. southern border. Over the last three years, millions of economic migrants have illegally crossed into the United States, placing significant strain on resources, disrupting communities, and diverting attention from other critical issues. The federal government must take responsibility and use every available resource and law to address this crisis.
Reform should include reinstating the "Remain in Mexico" policy, deploying more National Guardsmen to assist Border Patrol, increasing funding for border security, and utilizing advanced technology such as drones to monitor and secure the border more effectively. Additionally, the government must stop aiding in the release of individuals into the interior of the country. We need a comprehensive approach that prioritizes border security, protects American citizens, and ensures that immigration laws are enforced consistently and fairly.
How important is bipartisanship to you and what issues have you worked on across the aisle or with people who don't uniformly share your beliefs?
Bipartisanship is a core value of mine, and I strongly believe in working across the aisle to achieve common goals or find common ground for the benefit of the American people. However, that does not mean I will compromise my principles—there are certain issues I will never capitulate on. Congress must move beyond partisanship and the unethical behavior of some of its members if we are to make meaningful progress for our citizens.
As your next Congressman, I am committed to collaborating with my Democratic colleagues on key issues such as investigating and ending wasteful and exploitative Department of Defense contracts, addressing sexual assault in the U.S. military, simplifying the tax code by eliminating unnecessary loopholes, ensuring Ukraine has the resources to defeat Russia, and funding fusion technology to reduce America’s dependence on fossil fuels, among others. Together, we can create real change for the future of our nation.
What action, if any, do you want to see next on abortion access after the Dobbs decision?
The U.S. Constitution, through the 10th Amendment and established jurisprudence, does not grant Congress the authority to regulate abortion. As a U.S. Congressional candidate, I hold no public opinion on this issue because it is a matter of states' rights. The decision rests with state representatives, state senators, and governors, who are responsible for determining policy based on the will of their constituents in each of the fifty states.
Did Joe Biden legitimately win the 2020 presidential race?
Yes
Should the United States provide Ukraine with money in its fight against Russia?
Yes
Should the United States provide Ukraine with aid in the form of military supplies?
Yes
Should the U.S. provide Israel with money in its fight against Hamas?
Yes
Should the United States provide Israel with aid in the form of military supplies in its fight against Hamas?
Yes
Should there be a law requiring background checks on all gun sales?
No
Should Congress pass a federal law banning semi-automatic assault-style weapons and large-capacity magazines to help address gun violence?
No